Originally Posted By: cemar2
fearless:

I believe that maybe what I should have said is soul mates instead of lovers. What I want is the highest form of relationship, an all inclusive relationship. Companionship is NOT a complete relationship, it is much lower on the ladder. I want a relationship that IS companionship AND lovers AND best friends and (fill in the blank). If that is what soul mates are, then I guess that would be it.


CeMar...what IF...your W has never been your "soul mate". You do not creat a soul mate, you just "are" soul mates. That's a connection that just happens between two people, it cannot be fabricated if it doesn't exist already.

If that's truly your goal, then you are going to be swimming against the current for a very long time.

Honestly...why do you insist on only getting your "ideal"...what if your "ideal" isn't your W's...and then she's left to be miserable, why does there not appear to be any compromise with you? Why do you not ever set smaller attainable goals? If you do this you certainly don't share it, and I don't see it. I really don't see you setting a small goal to tackle, and then moving onto another small goal etc....in order to get to a larger end goal. With you (in my perception) it's either this or that, and it's all her fault.

As fearless has already pointed out to you, you may believe what you say is true about women and companionship but you'd be wrong for a great majority of women. Women crave intimacy as much as you do, even the LD ones. We all just have different ways that intimacy is achieved.

GEL


Well behaved women rarely ever make history!