Yeah, I do realize that. And in how many percent of cases is it TRUE!? Seriously, why does it have to come down to two people FIGHTING over one spouse, when in many cases that's NOT what it's all about? Is it SO hard to believe that someone is actually willing to gracefully let someone else go if that's what THEIR heart is telling them needs to happen?
I'm not sure these perceptions are entirely fair, I guess, and that's why I felt the need to speak up.
Morals that change dependent on what best meets *your wants* aren't morals.
You are allowing your feelings to determine right and wrong.
You are willing to let your hormones and brain chemicals to over write what you *know* is wrong.
Morals that depend on what your adulterous lover wants aren't morals either.
Where are *your* morals in all this?
My heart goes out to the abandoned common law wife and the child she bore this man.
That you have gone through this pain yourself and then allow yourself to justify being the agent of that pain to another woman is reprehensible.
Quote:
Is it SO hard to believe that someone is actually willing to gracefully let someone else go if that's what THEIR heart is telling them needs to happen?
*You* do what is right regardless of what someone else's heart is telling them to do.
If you had any compassion at all, you would cut off all contact with this man and give his existing relationship a chance to recover.
Surely you can see the sheer selfish blindness of coming here to justify adultery to people who are currently suffering from its effects? Doesn't that give you some idea of how off your current thinking is?
