Yes it did. Here's how I know: when I read LFL's post about how (paraphrasing) people give out all this specific advice, etc., I assumed that she was talking directly to ME! When I was giving hairdog all that specific advice about talking to his wife, LFL posted on that thread several times asking how I thought this new tactic of being like a broken record would make any difference. So when she commented on people giving specific advice, I just assumed she meant me!
Then when NOP posted his retort (and it WAS a retort), indicating that he assumed she was talking about HIM, I almost posted right after that: "Gee, NOP, you thought she was talking about you, and *I* thought she was talking about me!" with an attached smiley.
Edited to add after reading cobra's post:
Fearless, your posts do have a lot of disclaimers in them. It might be illuminating for you to examine why you think you need them. You're a very clear communicator, but no matter how clear YOU are, people are going to misunderstand and take things wrong from time to time. We all read through our own filters... no one else can fix that.
When I was giving hairdog all that specific advice about talking to his wife, LFL posted on that thread several times asking how I thought this new tactic of being like a broken record would make any difference. So when she commented on people giving specific advice, I just assumed she meant me! 