That, and the tissue that they cut off and throw away is full of nerve endings, too. The TV program "Talk Sex With Sue" claims there is little difference in feeling before and/or after, for most men if they had the procedure done as adults.
I am inclined to think there should be some difference in feelings, but how much?
Lil Is right about feelings being numbed some, since the head is in contact with clothing and becomes less sensitive. That is what I heard on the TV program anyway.
I know BB seems to have an "Ick" reaction when talking about the natural form, so there wasn't any debate when our son was born. It was cut.
Someone needs to find a medical site and find out how many nerve endings are removed in a typical procedure.
My way of thinking is males lived un-cut for tens-of-thousands years, so it can't be all that bad being un-cut.
In the program about Africa's AIDS, the thinness of the skin on the inside of the fore-skin allowed rapid migration of the HIV in to the blood stream, where normal outer skin stopped the migration of the HIV.
All of the medical and religious reasons not included, being cut myself, sex feels so good when the sex is/was good, could I stand anymore excitement?
It is sort of like the riddle, what hurts worse? Being crushed by a 10 ton rock or a 12 ton rock? Ouch, is all I think of.
I feel like Homer Simpson and his donut response, good sex is mesmerizing, fore-shin or not.
