Quote: Yes - but no hope for THE AFFAIR RELATIONSHIP, not the married relationship.
Ok, you choose to read it as such, but in context with the rest of that part of the article, I think it clearly is talking about the marriage. Notice it say RE-marriages, not second marriages. You don't RE-marry someone you've had an affair with.
Quote: Again, this is about the affair relationship. This is saying that this relationship is so intrinsically flawed that it can't survive on its own merits, but rather it requires sacrifices to keep feeding the dramatic romantic love in order to keep it alive, and even then, it WILL burn out.
I agree that this can legitimatly be taken either way and see your point. It does actually make more sense that way.
Quote: IF you continue the A, this will be the outcome. Any questions?
