The following comment is probably apropos of nothing, but this comment of Mrs. NOP's made me think of it:
Quote: If she doesn't have "hunger" then the double-fudge brownies aren't going to be calling to her, in the same way that having little/no sexual hunger results in no pursuit of sex. People who aren't hungry aren't going to be pondering the brownies, but if someone brings them in on a plate with whip cream and starts spoon feeding it to them, they can enjoy the brownie.
I've been struggling with my blood sugar recently and low-carbing rather furiously, but in my Real Life, I never met a Krispy Kreme I didn't like.
One of the diet/nutrition books I was reading recently told an anecdote about someone bring a box of homemade something-or-other into the office, and one of the slender people on the staff looked at the treats and said, "Wow! Those brownies (or whatever) REALLY look good! I wish I was hungry so I could eat one!"
Hmmm... I don't know about sex... but in the realm of food, if someone brought in a scrumptious-looking plate of brownies, whether I was hungry or not, I would at least taste one. This attitude, alas, has been my downfall in the realm of food.
But I wonder if it can carry over to sex... I wonder if a person might say, yes, the last time I had those brownies, they really tasted good, but because I'm not hungry right now, it makes no sense and does not even sound too appealing to even taste one?
