Quote: Here are the problems, reading the letter doesn’t equate to discussing it which also doesn’t equate to acting on it. Either she isn’t sincere in wanting to solve the problem, or doesn’t understand the magnitude of it.
I agree that her reading a letter is certainly not the equivalent of, nor a substitute for, discussion.
But Wilde was saying he didn't even get an acknowledgement of the existence of the letter OR of the fact that she had read it. I was addressing how to get her to own up to having been exposed to the contents of the letter. Getting her to discuss it... that's a task for the third millennium, alas.
