Thanks for reducing to simple logic MUCH better than my hair-brained attempt. Looking back on my post now, I think I was stuck somewhere hopelessly between my sophomore Logic 101 class, and the Geometry II proofs that I mostly slept thru...
Choc., who believes strongly that there is NO Transitive Property of Sex, which would state "If A wants to hump B, and B wants to hump C, then A wants to hump C."
