Originally Posted by Core
we can't even agree on what a man and woman are so how is one supposed to know what is allowed?

Originally Posted by Core
Kml I think its conflating this with trans talk and is the one who introduced the concept here.
Core, the obvious interpretation of "we can't even agree on what a man and woman are" is a reference to the existence, coming out, and recognition of trans, asexual, and genderfluid people and related civil rights rules.

(For me, it's not confusing it's incredibly simple--if John/Jane is an adult, they can choose their name and gender identity on their passport, as opposed to it being decided by their birth certificate, with no personal consequences for me except occasionally being confused by if Jane is currently going by "her" or "them".)

For your conjunction, you use "so"--as a result of, therefore, blaming.

Originally Posted by Core
You all pushing these people so far got the LGBs there killed.

Blaming kml, kml's family, and others LIKE ME who support LGBT+ family members and friends for the slaughter of LGBs in Afghanistan is bizarre and offensive. I get you're going through some mental health stuff, and I don't care enough about your personal views to be offended, but wanted to offer my support to other forum members and the LGBT+ community. Slaughtering people because they look or sound different is and always has been evil.

P.S. - It's "TOO" not "TO" and "IT'S" not "ITS".

Have a nice day.