Ok i know ive been posting like crazy but heres one more for the day.

Regarding thursday's court case - this is for the TRO not D.

Reason: WW claims i punched the trunk of her car outside a MC meeting we had back in Jan. I had been put on Meds the day prior, i have no recollection of this event. I recall being in the meeting, then driving. The events towards the end of the meeting and anything that happened outside literally i have no recollection of. I may very well have punched her car. I honestly do not recall. The point is the police didn't need to be called. She claimed she didn't know the Domestic thing would happen and she just wanted to report damages. She Apologized for it and asked if i was OK, and she was worried about me.
Last message from her i have ever received.
She believes (or at least claims to believe) that she could get in trouble from the RO as well, and this is not the case, and im fairly certain she has been aware of that. Just using it as an avoidance technique.

At the last hearing for this, which was the first hearing, i was offered a plea deal that was utter garbage, even my L said "Well we finally got an offer, and it [censored], were not taking it"
The "estimate for damages" included a bunch of other things not pertaining to the damages in question, so we rejected that out of hand.


Its her word against mine. No physical evidence other than her report and the dent in the car, which she could have caused (terrible driver, dents all over the car)
Or maybe OM dented it and they blamed it on me. Who TF knows.
My hand didn't hurt the next day, and i went to the hospital to get checked out from my lovely treatment by the Correctional Staff (they kicked the crap out of me)
and the hospital staff didn't say anything about my hand, after a through check over.

So it could turn out 1 of 4 ways as far as i see it.

1.) She shows up, and speaks in court presenting her "evidence". The system fails and i get charged with no real evidence, but this is a BIAS system after all (makes me look forward to D proceedings.....NOT)

2.) She doesn't show up and the case gets dismissed due to complete lack of evidence (my L said this would be the case if she didn't show up) HIGHLY UNLIKELY

3.) She does show up, and doesn't testify or come into the courtroom, like last time (Still not sure if that was her choice or directed by prosecution to do so). Likely continued again if this happens. Please no, i just want this over.

4.) She shows up, comes into court and presents evidence (or lack thereof) and I get found innocent or case dismissed.
This would obviously be ideal.

Just trying to be as ready as i can.


M: 35, EX-W: 3, S:4
All Divorce Proceedings Complete - Oct 18
-----------------------------------------------------
2nd EX - Was Engaged - Diagnosed BPD
2 Major breakups.
2 Rebounds