I think this should be a case of divided in the same language
A wayward may be a 'loser' or maybe not. A wayward certainly loses in the end. If not just by losing part of their integrity.
What you are saying is brave, waywards get litter sympathy on this board. Dynamics in each M are different.
So let's have this scenario, there are few waywards on this board more deliberately entitled wayward than the Giggalo. And of course his wayward behaviour was my fault. The Giggalo trades up in his long term partner but down with his cheating partners. He uses up the resources especially money of the long term then moves (or is booted) on. He may even marry but it's not for love.
I could have chosen to cheat or commit adultery. In doing so could have traded up in terms of partner with resources. And actually I doubt many would have blamed me. In fact after S and before D, I still considered it adultery. Maybe not wayward or unfaithful but certainly adultery. I didn't cheat, I walked. I ceased to stand.
Any one I could have cheated with is likely to be a trade up from the G. Almost anyone. But it is still a trade down, a loss, from the partner I want and need. So a loser? Oh yes definitely, not maybe in terms of job, material wealth etc but in terms of values? Certainly.
If you read my story then you will know about aged pa, an ordinary man who was truly extraordinary.
So I think we agree on the fact that wealth or lack of it may not mean a loser. But it may.
Freedom is just another word for nothing left to loose. V 64, WAW
