You are correct. The children do not have a legal residence as defined in the paperwork, and there is no “legal advantage.” However, when I talk to Katie about moving, she cries. I’ve tried multiple times. There is emotional attachment to that house on their behalf. It is the only thing that has remained constant in their lives. They do have social circles through their current preschool, friends and neighbors.
We moved to Epsom together, the school system was good then. Bow does have a good school as well, I understand that. I’m interested in security and stability as well. It is our job to pick up our children from school and ensure some structure and stability. Will you be changing jobs or traveling less? Who will be living at your house? If he is cosigning and you break up, what solidifies your residency in Bow so the kids can continue to go to school there? Your finances and business are your decisions to make, but they contribute to reasons that take you away from the kids.
Please do not threaten me anymore. If you have a lawyer provide their contact information. It is in the best interest of the kids for us to work together. We have withdrawn from each other’s lives as much as possible and things are no better. The hurt, resentment, anger, mistrust live on.
Me: 32 W: 29 T:8 M: 6 D4 S2 M - 8/2008 W is not happy - 1/2014 W wants D - 9/2014 W moved out - 11/2014 D filed - 1/23/2015 D'ed - 2/25/2015 Gave X the Letter - 11/10/2015
