I'll explain about the S(9) thing because that came up a lot in the texts.
She called me Sunday supposedly to discuss some things. Started off talking about joint filing taxes. Fine, no big deal.
Then she went to my plans for this coming weekend. I have the kids. D(15) has a party to go to from 5-11pm. And D(11) has a father-daughter dance. If I do both...which I was...then I needed a place for S(9) to go. Well, he and his sister are each in class with a brother and sister that our family friends of ours. So the dad and I planned to have my S(9) go over to their house and hang out with his friend, while we all go to the dance together...two girls and two dads.
So...my wife says...you know, any separation agreement would state that the parent gets the first right to babysit.
And I reluctantly agree, I was irritated that was sticking her nose in my plans for the weekend, but I agreed. Then I said, so I'll be by after the dance to pick up S(9).
That's when she lost it. I really didn't know she meant to keep him overnight. She said 'babysit' and to me that means temporary. I don't know. I didn't say it to make her angry, but angry she got.
Anyway...so that's that story.
Me:41 - LBH in apt W:39 - WW in home Kids:D(15), D(11), S(9) - custody % 58/42 M: 15 yrs - DoS: 10-11-15 (PA confirmed 2-12-16; WW dumped by AP 11-6-15; WW dated 7-8 men in Jan '16 via Match.com)