I have not heard of that ... but I do recall hearing about certain states one could go after the OM/OW for loss of potential earning income if a M ended due to an A. Call me bias .... but I am all for this ruling and any law that would hold a 3rd party financially responsible for 'damages' ... heaven knows people get paid off for mush less.


M: 48
W: 47
M16 T26-S8
BD Sept13