So I spoke to a D lawyer that has been a close family friend since I was probably my son's age. He's back in Indiana, so some of the laws are different - but thematically similar. Long story short from his perspective (and a few others) it doesn't seem as if there would be much validity to her attempt to re-write the agreement. This is basically because, as noted, there has been no material change in our circumstances since the agreement was finalized - and she DID review and sign off on it. He said essentially that the courts and/or judges do not care about the child's "bond with grandparents" - not that it DOESN'T matter, but it is secondary at best to time with parents. And, as is evident, she does have more time than me and we BOTH have two weeks of vacay with him in the summer - we just can't use them consecutively. Again - that opens the door to more time with her parents, but would just require her making two trips instead of one subsidized with my parenting time. Furthermore, there is unlimited availability for Skype and other video-chat options....which she currently DOES use with both of her parents.

L basically said that if there is nothing that I want from her, and there isn't, it is very possible that I can stonewall her on this issue. So far no word from her today.

Crimson