M, I agree with the others, vent here (or on FB ) and let cooler heads prevail when it comes to getting back to your H. I have a question, is the injunction you mentioned mandatory in your county? I was surprised when I got served papers to find one attached to it, it is mandatory in my county and applies to both W and me. It limits financial expenditures and even states that a person cannot be in the house between midnight and 6 am if the kids are there. It contains a lot of other restrictions as well such as prohibiting hiding of assets or intentional devaluing of joint property (such as damaging a house to reduce it's resale value). Honestly when I read it I thought "well this makes perfect sense and is a good idea" but I can see how a free-spending WAS would be aggravated by it, LOL! Anyway, it doesn't prevent your H from required expenditures, so one has to wonder why he feels it's "wreaking havoc" on his career. It makes me wonder if he feels his "career" requires frivolous expenditures of marital assets for "entertainment".
) and let cooler heads prevail when it comes to getting back to your H. I have a question, is the injunction you mentioned mandatory in your county? I was surprised when I got served papers to find one attached to it, it is mandatory in my county and applies to both W and me. It limits financial expenditures and even states that a person cannot be in the house between midnight and 6 am if the kids are there. It contains a lot of other restrictions as well such as prohibiting hiding of assets or intentional devaluing of joint property (such as damaging a house to reduce it's resale value). Honestly when I read it I thought "well this makes perfect sense and is a good idea" but I can see how a free-spending WAS would be aggravated by it, LOL! Anyway, it doesn't prevent your H from required expenditures, so one has to wonder why he feels it's "wreaking havoc" on his career. It makes me wonder if he feels his "career" requires frivolous expenditures of marital assets for "entertainment".