//Aren't you even curious why three people would find it offensive?//
I am curious. What exactly do you find offensive about this commment? What is the substance behind your offense?
You can't even guess why others would find it offensive, even if you don't?
I think the others here have answered it pretty well already. But I'll add a few statements.
Originally Posted By: RockJC
What does sex really take? You are asking her to lie on her back for less than 10 minutes and let you have her to show you that she cares for you? it is nothing
You are aware, aren't you, that intercourse can be painful for a woman if she is not properly aroused? And arousal is not simply a matter of lying back, and it is certainly not "nothing". I mean, your seeming ignorance on that point alone is astounding for someone who has already been in a marriage. As the others said, you seem to be describing a hooker performance in this sense.
Also, your statement says nothing about her orgasm. I mean, just lying back for intercourse alone, which, even for women who are fully participating, the majority won't experience an orgasm. So what more would you do? Or are you just happy with a woman who doesn't have an orgasm and you are satisfied?
What if she said that she can show her love for you in other ways instead? And that she would be fine with you going into the bathroom to pleasure yourself. What's really the difference if she's not enjoying it physically and is not turned on?
I'm also curious about your idea of eroticism. Is arousal and orgasm only to be accompanied by thoughts of devotion and love? Any naughty fantasies and shared acceptance?
