"What does sex really take? You are asking her to lie on her back for less than 10 minutes and let you have her to show you that she cares for you? it is nothing."
Wow. Haven't heard such an offensive and sexist remark like that in long time.
You really don't understand much about relationships. There are some women AND men who just don't see the need for sex. You can tell them that it's their biblical duty or whatever to take care of your needs as you interpret obedience but it's not going to make them want to drop their pants for you.
Oh and I do understand the Christian or other religious POVs on marriage duty and obedience quite thoroughly. I'm pretty sure this isn't what is meant to happen.
TBH, if that is the tone which you took things with your W in the past, I don't know why you're so surprised she's still angry at you.
If any of your 3 daughters told you that they just didn't feel like having sex for their H's (and they have no past hangups or anything) that they need to get on their backs and satisfy their men? I don't think that's what M in a spiritual sense is all about.
JMHO.
I don't expect my daughters to satisfy every kink of their man, but I really don't expect them to have a loyal husband in a sexless position. It's WRONG!
I would not be too happy, and If she wanted to keep a man in a sexless position, I would ask her to find a man who doesn't care about sex, or if she wants to keep her man in a sexless position, that she should understand when he satisfy himself outside the relation.
