MrBond, I understand what you're saying. Context matters here. Quality is more important than quantity for me too, but we would all agree we are assuming a certain range of quantity. And that's the assumption that's different -- sometimes very different. If a woman says quality is more important than quantity, and then you say, OK, you should be happy with one very high quality sexual encounter per year, rather than once a week, I think you would get a swift reply that now you have stretched the meaning of quantity so far that it is the bigger problem.
I'm looking for a high quality sexual encounter about once a day, or once every two days at a very minimum. Now you can insist that I should be happy with a very high quality sexual encounter once a week, and well, you can talk until you're blue in the face, but that won't ever be what I'd be happy with. And that does not mean that I'm more into quantity than quality. So I would say I resent the implication that because I want sex once a day, I really only want a prostitute, and not high quality sex.
So I'm just saying that this argument about quality over quantity is just a BS justification that people make make themselves feel better, with the implication that quality is more socially redeeming than quantity, and tying quantity to sleaziness and prostitution, etc. Not falling for it.
