I like your counterarguments. I still don't think it's possible to be "in love" with two people at the same time. You love your kids, you're not "in love" with them. I'm defining "In Love" as "limerence".
"In love" is that butte fly's infatuation lust feeling like when you were a teenager.
I believe it's possible to be "in love" with more than one person, to have chemical reactions set off in the brain from more than one person, to be "in lust" with more than one person.
However when it comes time to put yourself on the line, to be responsible to a person, etc... Love. There's going to be actual levels of that.
And you can be "in lust" without "loving" the person, but you can love the act you do with them.
