I won't reply to W until I heard from you guys on here.
My first thought was to respond with:
Quote:
"I don't believe we could work it out without solicitors."
I would be tempted to also state that she wants too much and she always needs to win and she will try and walk all over me. I wouldn't, that's just what I feel like saying.
Looking back at her "reasons" for the breakdown of the marriage. We had a lot problems with my family in 2009/early 2010 but things were fine 2011/2012. Her and mother clashed a bit but whats new there.
That last line in the email: You wish to persue everything to and fro solicitors then that is how you wish to proceed.
I could mind read that all day!!
Do you need more information or has she answered your question?
If you don't need more information, you don't need to reply other than as Kate said, "Thanks for the clarification."
And now take time to think about how you want to proceed.
Communicating in this way will be a 180 for you.
I don't need anymore clarification. I would like to know what she is get at though with this:
Quote:
You wish to persue everything to and fro solicitors then that is how you wish to proceed.
Something isn't right there.
I will happily reply with thanks for the clarification.
I'm going to leave it until tomorrow.
I do need to think about more 180's with W. They are all just based around me lately.
M36 W31 S4 S2 T5 M4 BD Jan12 S July12 Recon Sep12-Nov12 ILBINILWY Jan13 OM x 2 in 2013 W wants R July 13 I start D. Jan 14. Meet GF Nov 13 Have I changed enough? Jul 14