Good Old England

[Big Bruce]

hi,
i can't respond to all the points, some make sense to me, other points I beg to differ.
For the record if it took me 6 months to join them in Canada, it's because I was waiting for my papers!
Also the fact that W is emotionally unstable doesn't mean it's dangerous for him physically. In the long run, it will make an unbalanced kid, that's why I want S.
Also until now, it's not as of I had a choice: W doesn't want me to see him. We went to court the first time for this very reason. It's not funny.
The judge increased my time, but that's not enough, and W still doesn't want me to see my son. That's why we may have to go a second time to court. revealing her instability is going to help me get more time with my son. But I agree I run the risk of really pissing off her and her family.

And BTW, it has nothing to do with the money I pay her, the various supports are all based on a difference in salaries, not time with the child.

And I am a broken man, who realises he's being taken advantage of, and has received buffets on both cheeks one too many times. And I can put up with shame and betrayal, but don't take my son from me.

I am not trying to fix blame. On her or me, for what happened on our marriage, but for Pete's sake, she should leave the kid out of it and just give me 50% time.
The court can see that, can't they?

Is my view of the world still so skewed now? What am I supposed to tell the court so they see the boy needs his dad? I ask you- I'm begging you!, please!- forget the W and the money, what does it take for a father to see his son?

B.