Originally Posted By: zig


i guess if i think about it, i reacted to the single sentence, which gave a quite different message than what you just wrote:


I ALWAYS counsel someone to make their support agreement based ONLY on the family's basic needs. Each spouse -- wayward/walkaway and left-behind -- should properly be responsible for their own WANTS.


this ^^ sounds a lot different than what you first wrote.

thanks
zig


Understandable. Always best to assume GOOD intentions, or just ask me directly for clarification. I post in "shorthand" sometimes, and am happy to expand upon my thinking when someone asks. Sometimes, however, it's intentional, and designed to illicit thought by its very brevity and clarity.


Starsky

M57 W 57; D30 D28 S24 S20 GD7 GD2 GD1 GD5m GD1m
BD 5/07; W's affair 5/07-8/07

At the end of every hard-earned day, people gotta find some reason to believe. (Bruce Springsteen)