I'd be really interested in understanding if you two could have a conversation without the need to prove a point - your H by needing to prove his point with internet links and you by needing to be right or prove him wrong or that he is contradictory.
Funny, that's exactly what I thought I was doing when I didn't pursue any justifications for his belief in the article, but just said I wanted to confirm that he truly believed it, but was told that I was being "very provocative and even a little passive aggressive."
