As a result there is the resignation to two unpalatable alternatives...accept a sexless marriage or divorce. Those represent the polar bookends given the current experience. And in this website, there is advocacy for keeping a marriage intact (but also strengthening it so that it functions rather than just being a marriage in name only).
So, you won't see a lot of advocacy for divorce though there is the clear recognition that it happens.
Likewise, I wouldn't expect to see a lot of advocacy for open marriages on this website. But why imply that divorce is the only alternative? In fact, some people remain married merely for financial, etc. reasons. The discussion here seems to imply that love, sex, and marriage are all words for the same thing. Clearly they are not.
I didn't reduce it to that.
I said,
assuming that you are accurate, and that nothing you do will get your w to agree to having sex, what then?
Let me add to that something you have said before, yet now seem to contradict...
you said you were NOT okay with a sexless marriage.
So, if "x" is a condition in the marriage that will not change and "X" is not acceptable-
what do YOU want US to do with that?
You seem to argue the opposite of every possibility tossed out.
what do you want?
M: 57 H: 60 M: 35 yrs S30,D28,D19 H off to Alaska 2006 Recon 7/07- 8/08 *2016* X = "ALASKA 2.0" GROUND HOG DAY I File D 10/16 OW DIV 2/26/2018 X marries OW 5/2016