Curious as to others' take on what 25MLC is saying in the above post. ^^^
TBH. I am surprised by it. Because what I thought was clear was you were and did set a boundary on this.
I.e. What MHL said. "until you can committ, the casual communication hurts"
(on my phone so paraphrasing)
BUT. What I take from what you did was some weird in-between. Engaged her some. But kind of half ass. Then ignored.
Again. I see MIXED SIGNALS by YOU.
I think it is time to be clear one way or another.
Yes she is reaching out to you. She has before. Many times. But what she has NOT done is committed.
You can go back to where you were as easy as 1-2-3. But is that what you want?
CS
you are correct. I am being inconsistent b/c
when it comes down to Denver's example,
I don't see why he can't do the regular "rules" we advise others to do and
End conversations first, initiate zero contact, and see where she goes.
It's dim, not "dark".
But I take your point.
M: 57 H: 60 M: 35 yrs S30,D28,D19 H off to Alaska 2006 Recon 7/07- 8/08 *2016* X = "ALASKA 2.0" GROUND HOG DAY I File D 10/16 OW DIV 2/26/2018 X marries OW 5/2016
