MHL said he was "coming across like a jerk when he didn't respond, and 25mlc told him to "stop ignoring her texts." That's what I was disagreeing with.
Dark is dark, and it is neither rude nor jerky if one explains -- precisely ONCE -- to the walkaway why they're doing it.
I thought Denver was wise to avoid his wife's baiting texts.
Starsky
I said to answer her ONCE, politely so she'd know he wasn't being petty.
(unless the question needs an answer. I thought the 'left the glasses at the house' wasn't weird and deserved an answer...or the owner of the glasses did...)
But going dim or dark is what I think would be a real 180 and MIGHT help.
It seems to get her attention...
Denver simply has to find that balance between going dark/dim and
not being a jerk or looking like the old Denver.
That can be a challenge
but aren't we all finding some sort of fine line at these times?
M: 57 H: 60 M: 35 yrs S30,D28,D19 H off to Alaska 2006 Recon 7/07- 8/08 *2016* X = "ALASKA 2.0" GROUND HOG DAY I File D 10/16 OW DIV 2/26/2018 X marries OW 5/2016
