I believe his said "incidental contact" (like at work) was OK, but no relationship. But I do agree, his entire timelines has been fraught with fuzzy boundary-setting and articulation. I objected to it at the time, too, because I thought it would be ripe for parsing later on.
and she's not even the lawyer here...
M: 57 H: 60 M: 35 yrs S30,D28,D19 H off to Alaska 2006 Recon 7/07- 8/08 *2016* X = "ALASKA 2.0" GROUND HOG DAY I File D 10/16 OW DIV 2/26/2018 X marries OW 5/2016
