Originally Posted By: Denver_2010


Not taking sides here Starsky, but Cat is correct. The toilet event happened on June 1st, the W and I had our long conversation in which we agreed that she would take June to just be by herself on June 3rd.

I have lots of responses to all of the posts that my thread got yesterday, and also have an update... but it will have to wait because I am slammed with work for the next couple of days!

Denver


Originally Posted By: Denver_2010, on 4/11/2011:


gr8 - W is not in contact with OM right now. My W is a professional vocalist with an entertainment company and a few different bands. OM is a horn player whom she works with on occasion. They were both at a recording session about a week and a half ago, and OM apparently was trying to avoid W. W felt badly about the situation, said that she felt horrible about hurting OM.

I agree. W is confused right now.

Thanks for your thoughts. I appreciate it.

Denver



There are other posts I could pull, but my only point was this:

While some of us would have preferred for you to state your boundaries more clearly, there's absolutely no doubt from my point of view that "the spirit of the law" was that your wife was to use this "space" time, ALONE, without OM influencing her, and that furthermore, she led you to believe she was doing this.

The only point I was trying to make was not to feel so apologetic about needing transparency from her, when there was a recent history of:

a. infidelity, and

b. deceit.

If anyone thinks this OM was just checking out Denver's wife's commode plumbing, or thinks that his wife has been honest and trustworthy through all of this, well I guess you've just been reading different threads than I have.


Starsky


M57 W 57; D30 D28 S24 S20 GD7 GD2 GD1 GD5m GD1m
BD 5/07; W's affair 5/07-8/07

At the end of every hard-earned day, people gotta find some reason to believe. (Bruce Springsteen)