Correct me if I'm wrong, Time, but if you are suggesting my W is pushing this, I agree and that is what I was suggesting in my post. It would benefit W and super if the teacher were to be fired.
Here are some things from the state school board site -
Code of Conduct -
Quote:
I will avoid any conflict of interest or the appearance of impropriety which could result from my position
, and will not use my board membership for personal gain or publicity.
And -
The Board Employs a Superintendent.
The Board employs and evaluates one person - the Superintendent - and holds that person accountable for district performance and compliance with written Board policy.
An effective School Board develops and maintains a productive relationship with the Superintendent. The employment relationship consists of mutual respect and a clear understanding of respective roles, responsibilities and expectations. This relationship should be grounded in a thoughtfully crafted employment contract and job description; procedures for communications and ongoing assessment; and reliance on written policy. Although the Board is legally required to approve all employment contracts, the Board delegates authority to the Superintendent to select and evaluate all district staff within the standards established in written Board policy.
Quote:
Not saying it isn't all his idea, but who was it questioning you about the possibility of the teacher having contacted you via phone?
My W told the board that she saw the teacher's phone# on my phone bill. She gladly gave that bit of info.
Quote:
But... I have to ask... (and maybe rob is sensing it too), just who is it you are really dealing with here? Judging only by actions, of course.
It seems to me to be a team effort and they are trying to get as many people on their side as they can no matter who gets screwed in the process.
