BH, I know, he acts like the cards are in his hand, but in reality it's me that has the upperhand at the moment.

I realized last night why he said he wanted to own the house by himself without the ow. This was just an excuse of why he put the 100k in her name, he was trying to make it look like he owed her that money. Now when his bs was called out by the judge he says he is going to remain co-owners with the ow so now miraculously (sp?)he doesn't owe her a 100k anymore.

They are nothing but a bunch of frauds who act like they can outsmart anyone.


Me:35, ex: 36
Sons: 9 & 7
Bomb: July, 2006
Divorced 2009