Is LRT applicable here?

[pearlharbr]

Usually most people want / need proof for confrontation purposes and / or evidence for D proceedings. It's good to have because all cheaters lie and will often continue to lie even when confronted with evidence. For me, I wanted it to prove that I wasn't crazy, this was indeed happening. It didn't matter at all legally because we're not married, but I was able to say to BF in no uncertain terms that we both knew he was lying to my face and I found it incredibly disrespectful. It also helps when you're explaining to family and friends (especially if they're on the WAS side) that you have proof, you aren't imagining things, and you didn't just "grow apart" like the WAS wants everyone to believe.

Have you consulted an attorney yet? If not, put that on your list of things to do ASAP. Knowledge is power and you want to retain the upper hand. If you live in a fault state ask the L if filing on grounds of adultery is advantageous to you. And if so, what type of proof would be required.

If it doesn't matter legally, and it doesn't matter to you personally, then I wouldn't worry about it. I am the type of person that had to know the truth, but some people operate better from an assumption and would be harmed more by knowing details.

Since your W is already out of the house I don't see a point in confronting her about the A unless / until she says she wants to come back. But perhaps Rob has a different take on it.

Oh, just thought of a reason. If you want to go the route of exposing the A to help hasten its demise then you'll need proof.

And if you have a joint cell phone account you can access the records now before you split hers off.