Yeah. I'm just in a holding pattern until I can finish the boxing and moving. I can't make much progress tonight, but I hope to be done by tomorrow night. So, no need to add anything, but thanks for dropping in!
I've been reading a lot of Rob and Puppy's posts to other threads and I am curious about the topic of proving the A. It seems the advice is to only accuse the WAS if you have hard evidence. Since the W is out of the house and not working towards reconciliation, accusing her is premature (even though she admitted to the OEA and I was told "no" about the PA, which I don't believe).
Is the sequence of events: 1. W wants to work it out. 2. Address the A. 3. W denies, so have proof 4. Make sure it is over.
I'm not even to Step 1, and it may not even happen. But it is good to be prepared. Is that about right?
