Always appreciate all the comments you guys provide. It helps me to sort out all this stuff.
This what I wrote:
I am glad to see that you have begun to show some interest in D2. In the past few months your decisions have not been in the best interest or safety for D2 ,the baby or me. In light of these poor decisions you no longer are a trustworthy person. Until you demonstrate genuine respect and support for me and the children we will not participate in any conversations with you. I fear for my safety, these children’s safety when you communicate angrily and threaten us to show up at my residence if I do not do what you want. In the event you do come over uninvited I will be forced to protect my life and my children‘s lives.
I was thinking it's clear. Does it spell out he has to be trustworthy? He has to respect and support me and my children? how can he think that by thanking me for sending him a msg adn telling me they are his children as well is now trustworthy? That in a msg he "says" hes going to give me money and wants to set up a time to see d2, trust has grown in words?
Am I wrong to wait out in the dark for him to be consistent in providing money in being respectful, supportive? i don't think he has and that tells me he thinks believes he can just walk all over me and translates to no respect for me or my children.
Am I off here?
Me 39 H 30 d 18 previous marriage d 2.5 with H s 4.5months with H Seperation Nov09 july i'm dim to dark - set internal deadline
