IMO, doing nothing is always a good choice because it compels the other person to really think about what they are doing and communicating. It basically keeps the ball in their court and they follow up on the facets they really need to. It sort of dilutes the issues down to the bare bones. Meaning, at some point, she will contact you specifically in regard to one issue as opposed to focusing on her general sentiment. You are out of her way and she has to own what she has initiated.
I still think either way is fine because you can get a similar result. Do what you can live with, it's not that consequential in the long run.
I'm still on the fence about what to do. This is my draft: "W,
I completely understand your feelings about the communication problems, being beat up and not doing anything wrong. I really do. I also understand your view about my leaving last fall. I am so very aware of what I have done and I accept total responsibility for all of it. Given a second chance I would spend the rest of my life making it up to you.
If you believe that disillusion will make you happy then I accept that. I can’t stop you from divorcing me, just know that what I want is to be with you and for our marriage and our family to be together again.
RSF"
Somnething about this seems arrogant:
"If you believe that disillusion will make you happy then I accept that."
Am I accepting it or should I be letting her know I support it if its right for her?
AKA: "Ben the school teacher" --- Me:45, W:41 | Ds:10,12&14 | M:18, T:20 Me: MLC+PA+WAS+Separated 10/08 My Request to Reconcile Denied 7/09 W w/OM 6/09-11/09