Something that bothers me... The book seems to specifically address first marriages. Heck, if that's the case and it's both me and my wife's second or third marriage, the book would seem to suggest that we both should still be in out first marriage because we should have never left. I realize that some grounds for divorce are drug/alcohol abuse and physical abuse, but what if neither of these apply? If there is no "acceptable" reason why I am divorced and the book is saying that I should have stayed, then what am I doing in this marriage? And if I am to apply all of the principles to this marriage as if it's the first, the doesn't that just totally undermine the entire premise of the book?
