We can agree to disagree \:\) . IMHO, this does go both ways.

You said this:

Originally Posted By: Sugar and Spice
I did not expect him to do anything.


....then this immediately after:

Quote:
Expectation was created when he expressly told me and my S more than once that HE was going to do something.


The expectation WAS there for H to show up. Understandable.

Quote:
We did not seek him out nor did we invite him, he is solely to blame for this, not me.


I did not say you sought him out nor did I think it. However, you did continue to call him. I guess what I want to ask is why didn't you let it go then? He was at the card room. Remember - my H was big on gambling, too. So I KNOW when he would tell me, "I'll be there in an hour", it wasn't likely to happen. He was either going to show up on time or not.

Yes, your H does need to be made aware of the consequences of his actions, but really - how do the guilt trips make it any better? How does it bring you two closer together? It doesn't.

He chose gambling over time with the kids - he IS solely to blame for that, but you are responsible for the part that you play. The jabs that follow because you are upset and disappointed with his poor choices.

If H says he's going to do XYZ, say 'ok', and if for whatever reason he doesn't follow through, leave it be. Show him through your ACTIONS - NOT WORDS - that it's unacceptable. That is the only way he is going to get the picture, and I really don't think he's going to get it if he's told his actions are wrong, sarcastically or not. He needs to SEE what the true consequences of his actions are.


Getting over a painful experience is much like crossing monkey bars. You have to let go at some point in order to move forward. ~ Joseph Campbell