Yeah the point I was making with the matchmaking example was: If we assume that for whatever reason (physiological differences between the men & women?) there are 80% HDmales, 20% LDmales, 40% HDfemales and 60% LDfemales. In an ideal world we would teach young people to find their mates being sure that their sex drives matched before committing long term.
Ok so all the HD's get together and all the LD's get together. So the 40% HDf get a match and the 20% LDm get a match. Well that makes 60% of the marrying population happy but what about those poor leftover 40% mismatched people? Well at least would could improve the divorce rate from 50% to maybe 40%, that's better than nothing!
Obviously this is an over simlification of the problem. There is much more to this than just numbers. People change as we all know and child birth throws a wrench in the works sometimes. As Dance said HDf find they are with LDm and can't figure out what happened.
I thought I had married an HDf. Knowing what I know now, she is not HD. But the differences are subtle when you have fallen in love and are in the throws of passion together in those early years of a realtionship.
