But it is a pretty elaborate thing for your W to do if there is NO truth here.
Elaborate for her to say - he was always working, and when he wasn't working, he was on his bike? I don't know. I don't know how "elaborate" that is. I think she is being coached by her abused women's support group to say these things.
They just aren't true. She can retroactively "perceive" me to have worked 60 hour weeks, but there is no truth there. And she never once approached me and said, you know, honey, you are working too much and I don't think you see the kids enough. It's retroactive! I mean...how is it reasonable that she can twist my employment into a flaw, a reason I should not have my kids?
M 43 S14 S13 D11 D7 Divorce final: Jan 2009 Making it up as I go....
