Quote:
Hey, Mojo! I thought you didn't have time to post! If you're gonna post, then hightail it back to your thread and give us DETAILS! \:\)


LOL- I'm just taking mini-breaks today.

Quote:
Burg has had this attitude for a while. Relationship or not, to regard the other gender as the enemy is not good.


I don't think that BB or BF really regard the other gender as the enemy. I think they regard their own St. Bernards and Puppies as the enemy. I can relate because this is roughly analogous to me regarding my own Cow and Bunny as the enemy. However, I think that it is possible to be Strong Bunny or Strong Puppy (vulnerable rather than weak or helpless) and then you don't have to be your own enemy. The only thing that confuses me is the whole sexism issue about whether it is inherently more feminine to be Strong Bunny (vulnerable) than it is masculine to be Strong Puppy (vulnerable). IMO, absent any physical sexual characteristics neither strong bunny or puppy behavior would be read as sexy but simply sweet, dear, lovable etc. It is attractive but not sexually attractive/arousing without added context.


"Tell me, what is it you plan to do with your one wild and precious life?" - Mary Oliver