Originally Posted By: MJontheMend
Quote:
Well this only reinforces in my mind that the whole wolf theory of Blackfoot, Stig and any others that buy into...it reinforces that it's a bunch of horse sh!t.


The theory is absolutely valid but also absolutely limited.
Oh I agree it's valid...just as you step in horse sh!t...it's valid...it's still all over your shoe...and...it stinks!

Originally Posted By: MJontheMend
If you are a man single or married and you want to get laid by a woman who is sexually aroused then you better vibe pretty wolf. However, it just isn't the case that anyone is pure wolf or any other animal in the zoo and it's better to be self-aware about your desire for things like simple affection and companionship and maybe even a bit of romance.


Well this is where I kind of disagree...or maybe I'm just not able to recognize my vibe that gets me laid as being wolf-like \:\/ I can think of only a few occasions in my life where I recognized the vibe as pure wolf when the sexually aroused female was basically presenting Miss Kitty....very unfulfilling fck em' and leave em' sex. I guess what it boils down to with me is this...what animal in the zoo am I looking to get fcked? My answer is all of them...even the ferret



Originally Posted By: MJontheMend
I actually believe that the most rational way to make a decision about a LTR partner, given that you have your zoo in order, is on the basis of compatibility as companion. One dating book I read said that you might want to strongly consider whether the man you are dating would be someone you would want to have lunch with even if he was a woman.


Brilliant author ;\) Should send a copy of that book to Old Lone Wolf Jack.

"If you can't lick em, lick em" - Ted Nugent