Corri, I am concerned about everyone on the forum, even if I don't approve or understand why they do some things.
I am not against having fun/a good time/ or what ever one calls it. I am risk aversive, especially when the risks are long term, have a high potential price, or are way past a moral boundary.
As far as Corri being cryptic, I can say some of her posts cause one to guess about lots of things. I was that too until I worked in the group home. No room for guessing or most of the time no room for opinions.
One female employee thought two kids had sex in a room. It was at a co-ed facility. She wrote a report that the kids looked like their clothes were different than she had seen them 5 minuets earlier and the room smelled musty, like she remembered when she had sex with her partner.
The clothing looking different was an observation, so it was "legal" according to the reviewing case worker. The “musty smell” was an opinion and subjective and that idea was thrown out.
To make matters worse, typically when a case manager or judge throws out some parts of what many people called evidence or clues, “musty smell in this case, the person that included the clues gets reprimanded or made to look foolish.
Some of the above implied reasons, is why I include details that might look like whining or giving too much information that maybe should have been withheld for discretionary reasons.
