Anyway, she emailed last week to tell me that since her divorce (I'm paraphrasing here in the interest of time) she's been communicating with dead people, that back in September she received a message for me and that's the only time she's gotten a message that wasn't for her.
Oh, so you meant actually crazy. In that case, I would say that it is true that more single PEOPLE are crazy. I have noted a much higher percentage of conspiracy theorists and people who think Star Trek is the greatest show ever amongst non-married men than those who are married.
Quote:
Mojo, you're working against your own stated goal of getting laid regularly unless by "regularly" you meant "one weekend a month". Crazy.
I'm not crazy, just a bit confused. Also, I should note that my goal isn't to "get laid" regularly. My goal is to be "affectionately man-handled" regularly. Of course, "getting laid" is frequently a type of "affectionate man-handling" so the two goals would be fairly complementary. However, there are a lot of activities that would fall under the category of "affectionate man-handling" that could be accomplished long-distance. Also, I'm sure you can see that I could be sexually monogamous yet still not be dependent on any one man to meet my stated goal. That is why I said that I might agree to the MWoC type arrangement you suggested with a man with the understanding that I would still be free to seek "affectionate man-handling" from others on my current sexual partner's busy weekends etc. Since I assume that all men to whom I am not married are actually polygamous, his weekend activities would not concern me as long as I was getting enough overall "affectionate man-handling".
"Tell me, what is it you plan to do with your one wild and precious life?" - Mary Oliver
