Mojo, I don't think the women I'm dealing with are analagous to girls walking their little sisters to school.
Well, you might if you considered all her undeveloped ovum to be her little sisters and reflected on the reasons why you would never hit a woman.
Quote:
After some pondering, I think you could look at the issues I'm talking about as female testing, which has been discussed 'round these parts before. When a woman doesn't do what she says if a guy makes excuses for her and goes on about business as usual, his goose is cooked. If instead he says, "I'm not going to deal with you because you're not reliable," she suddenly wants to know what she can do to make it up to him.
The thing I can't figure out is if you Deida-following guys want to be the leader in your relationship or want an equal partnership. To me it's like you're all saying "I'll be the leader as soon as I find a woman who is just as capable as me to be the leader too so if I f*ck up she can take the helm." I'm not finding fault with either philosophy. I'm just confused. Maybe this is just due to the fact that you are all in lone wolf rather than Alpha mode. Have any of you read the book Deida wrote for women about yearning and such? I haven't actually read it but I skimmed some excerpts and I think I kind of get it. IMO, he is saying that a woman should be strong bunny but all you guys seem to be looking for a strong lioness. However, it's entirely possible that I am dead wrong.
"Tell me, what is it you plan to do with your one wild and precious life?" - Mary Oliver
