I'm cool with a guy being polygamous even though I'm monogamous as long as it's understood that my monogamy is only serial until I'm asked to commit.

Igor! Come here. Chop-chop. Prepare this female for cloning right away.

Then again, I can't tell you how that F logicaling breaks down so quickly once they see I'm Fing another F a lot hotter than they perceive themselves to be. Amazing how biology always overrides the will.

Also, strong monkey might do some damage to a boy's ability to be polygamous whilst sharing my company.

Maybe the ones pushing 60 or studs like Lou. Doubtful for the ones any younger though. Amazing how one's libido can be turbocharged when any half capable M can go to any number of Fs places, F them rotten, and retreat to his own bachelor pad fortress of solitude.

None of that 24/7 energy sapping baby crying, F expectations for AOS, bitchy mood swings, and nails on chalkboard F screeching over sitting on the pot after some male dum-dum forgot to replace the toilet paper roll etc etc.

Plus, sometimes it's hard for a guy to deal with the thought of a future lacking in quality time with my pilgrim soul which although it is not actually to be found between my legs tends to leave a relationship along with what is found there when my boots get to walking.

True. Most males of any status usually get tired of Fing 23 YO ditzy hard bodies and eventually would like to have a similar frame of F intelligent reference in his life so the frumpy pilgrim girl starts to look appealing.

Kind of like the Amish. "Hey, man, check out that chick in the bonnet with no makeup. I can't explain it but she is looking hot to me for some weird reason." scritchscritch.

Well, because you really are a nice guy, you make it clear to a girl that you aren't a nice guy when you respond to her profile, right?

(eye roll) Pay attention, Mojo. The NG word isn't in my vocab, hence would never appear in my profile or emails. I said back on your old thread I am a "nice PERSON and not a nice guy." Sure, sounds ticky-tack but an important distinction in my version of reality.

I only respond to men who signal St.Bernard AND Wolf. I am open to the possibility of commitment but not insisting on it from every guy I f*ck or fall "in love" with (my profile is sadly lacking in statements such as "I don't play games") and I want to hook up with guys who are operating from a similar position.

Well, sadly schmadly. Thank goodness for that. I imagine I might spit my coffee all over my computer whilst holding my convulsing belly if I saw a separated W's profile that included the line: "I don't play games."

Believe it or not, GP was not "playing" me. He really does want to get married at this point in his life and he was seriously infatuated with me for a while so was considering me as a candidate. Yup, men get foolishly infatuated too. Funny world we live in. You, of course, are impervious to that kind of thing being all currently wolf-like and therefore invulnerable.

No, I don't believe GP played you and never said I did. I have issues about GP for my own reasons. I already know why that fell apart.

Um, you weren't "in love" with him as you've already said before. Hard to feel that gut level "in love" feeling with your therapist, eh?

I don't even go there. An F starts yapping to me about her R and PAl ex, I put my finger to my full pouty lips. Shhhh.

What? Why are you doing that?

Other than some dumb online BB where I spew my dreck for free, if you want my take on your mess of an R my hourly rate is $500 per. Are we clear? Keep your male skeletons out of my bed. It's creepy.

The thing that isn't computing with you, I know, is that I remained highly sexually attracted to GP even though he was rather foolishly infatuated with me. Could it be that he was manifesting strong wolf AND puppy at the same time? How is that possible?

No, I see why you lust after him. Big guns, river rock pecs, assertive, of some principles, calling you ooo so sexy when you as much as said last year you wanted a shlub to compliment your azz at least thrice daily or weekly -- ie ego stroking that the STB apparently was too caught up inhimself to provide.

His failure IMO was he couldn't ultimately hide his neediness and placating to hold your favor and try to win your "in love-ness." The line about missed out babies, the constant phone calls etc.

But as I hinted earlier ... I have a much bigger issue with GP himself and his attraction-killing acumen.

Let me put it to you this way. And I must remind you, this is only me. Your own results may vary:

If an F I'm way into EVER calls x a Punk Azz Bitch within ear shot of me or piles on when I am grousing about her, my door would slam so hard in her face her head would spin.

That's called supplicating and placating me to the point of disrespecting someone I loved and someone with whom they have not one scintilla of experience or contact.

After all, I very well could be completely full of sh!t and the whole reason/culprit for my failed R. She should be somewhat aware of tmy amazingly one-sided bias and refrain from sucking up to my azz and taking my side so easily.

I can understand well enough why an F might do this -- after all, I do have experience with Fs and have witnessed them first-hand utterly eviscerate one another behind their GFs' backs to me, then snap in line and girl-bond with the very same gutted females.

But I can't tolerate this behavior from a man. I find it incredibly weak. Hence my big issue with GP.

So if I had any advice to any Ms who might be reading this I would urge you to NEVER debase yourself and stoop to currying favor from an F by bashing the men she has or has had in her life. That's weak game and the sucker's way out.

Annnnkkh, as NOPs might say. Placating and supplicating -- those two so dang overused words on this dang forum. It's equal and bi-directional in the M-F dynamic.

In my hypothetical situation with the F I'm thinking LTR: Not only does it kill any "in love" feeling for her but the shrapnel takes out straightup love and possibly even "like."

Nnnnnext.

-Stigmata-


The difference between a warrior and an ordinary man is the warrior views everything as a challenge;
the ordinary man views everything as either a blessing or a curse.

-Yaqui shaman Don Juan-

...and that holds 2x true for nice guy wussies, DJ

-Stigmata-