The questions aren't bullstuff (at least not in my opinion, or I wouldn't have asked them), they are based on assertions made by a well known psychologist. I will reveal the text of the assertions and the name of the book a bit later on.
Welp. As I say. You cannot see what you cannot see, until you do. But if you can never see, then you can't, and there is no reason on the planet for blaming a man/woman for not being able to see if they are blind. Period. Are they a throw away?
Depends on the quality of the rest of the R.
We all 'give up,' something, no matter who we meet.
Unless you go in, knowing what you can and cannot live with, you will build anger and resentment. There are unknown variables. Always.
I would like to think that I can meet things head on. Obviously, there are things I just cannot live with.
Really had nothing to do with a man who loves me or sexually desires me.
It had more to do with 'self.' And the questions and hard answers I was never willing to face (or knew to ask) before I committed.
If I had to choose?
I always said, if my best friend were a man, I'd have married her. And we don't have sex, and have never even considered it.
So. I guess I'd have to go with love. If forced to choose.
