Wanted to leave you with this thought for the holiday weekend, something my IC taught me.
"You can't furnish a room with the word couch"
It is the actual physical object in the room that furnishes the room. You can't just say "couch" and have a furnished room. The word alone is not enough, or a rose by any other name is still a rose. Just as in the word "marriage", you can't just say it and have a marriage, it is a two way agreement between 2 people, once 1 side breaks the agreement there is no longer a marriage, despite the fact that the other side keeps saying marriage.
If I remember correctly, part of your seperation agreement with your wife, was that she would no longer have the lunches w/ her OM. If she has broken part of the agreement does that not void the entire agreement? I think as an atty you would have some type of leagal-ease for this.
This thought would probably be considered anti-DBing, but there will come a time, and perhaps you are already there, where you may consider the fact that the M is no longer viable to save. Once you truly accept this fact, and IMHO you can't truly detach until you accept this fact.
Me: 41 W: 38 Son7 M 13 years 3/07 Bomb "This marriage isn't working for me anymore" S 5/26/07 Thread