What I don't understand about Deida is that he wants us to achieve our happiness on our own. If the was possible, I would be doing it.

So if you admit you don't understand Deida's MAIN POINT, why do you even want to continue to talk about Deida? It's quite clear that you don't understand more likely don't like his philosophy. That's fine. Just leave it alone then.

And if this was true, then I don't understand why men would need woman at ALL in their lives.

?? So you truly think that the only reason men need women is to make them happy??

Having a woman that desires you causes an incredibly high level of happiness.

Sure I completely understand how great it feels to be desired. I just don't understand how you can't have an acceptable level of happiness without it.

If I was capable of achieving this level of happiness on my own, I WOULD BE FREAKING DOING IT.

Would you? It really does not seem like you have tried the suggestions from people or from Deida or from Michele, etc.

I can't think of any goal in life that is SUPERIOR to the desire of a woman.

And that right there says that you completely disagree with Deida's philosophy. So why bother reading Deida or misquoting him here?

I asked you specifically to give page numbers and the exact quotes for Deida and you haven't. I was able to look and give the exact quotes from Deida and the page numbers for my arguments. It seems to me that you are not being very logical in your reading and understanding of Deida.




But what is happiness except the simple harmony between a man and the life he leads? ~Albert Camus