Divorcebusting.com  |  Contact      
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 4 of 5 1 2 3 4 5
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,116
S
Member
Offline
Member
S
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,116
Looks like we got the trifecta!

Hairdog

Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 332
N
Member
Offline
Member
N
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 332
HD,

OK..now that wa a very good description of sex to me...I am LD. So HD people like all build up stuff too..flirting, kissing, teasing, and on and on???

I thought that the HD people just like raw sex mostly and mainly. I suppose it varies from person to person?????

Nicegal

Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,012
G
Member
Offline
Member
G
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,012
Hey guys...don't forget me...I did have sex in some form last night

GEL


Well behaved women rarely ever make history!
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,012
G
Member
Offline
Member
G
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,012
nicegal,

Oh hon....you have that so wrong. People who like "sex" or HD people...whatever you want to call us, like everything that goes with it....especially the flirting and anticipation....as long as we aren't left hanging at the anticipation stage.

It's affection, it's intimacy in many forms. Kissing, petting, slight touches from that someone special throughout the day....those are all wonderful things that make the other person feel special and wanted. It's all flirting...that can get both of you ready for something more later on.

GEL


Well behaved women rarely ever make history!
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,775
K
Member
Offline
Member
K
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,775
Nicegal,

Absolutely -- the anticipation is the best part. Raw sex is nice but so is romantic sex, gentle sex, athletic sex. So is a kiss on the back of the neck, so is the random fondle when you can't do anything about it.

The LD charge that "every time I touch you it leads to sex" is only true to a point. If the HD person isn't touch or sex starved they can handle a "raincheck later honey, I just wanted to touch you" but a sex-starved person will be less able to handle the "not right now." Make sense?

Karen

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,390
Member
OP Offline
Member
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,390
Quote:

The LD charge that "every time I touch you it leads to sex" is only true to a point. If the HD person isn't touch or sex starved they can handle a "raincheck later honey, I just wanted to touch you" but a sex-starved person will be less able to handle the "not right now." Make sense?

Karen




NiceGal, let me expand on this, if I may (my thread, so why not? )

Absolutely, I love every imaginable part and style of sex. Nothing gives me greater pleasure than spending an hour kissing and caressing. I would love to spend a week in "foreplay" (glances, kissing, caresses, activities together, etc.), leading up to a night of passion. That would turn me on to no end.

One of the things W and I discussed yesterday (briefly, we will revisit this topic a lot, I think) is that early in our M, it became apparent that we had a divergent desire for and appreciation of sex. I made the comment that I am basically "always ready", whereas she did not feel that way. This led to her backing off the other stuff like kissing, displays of affection, etc, because she felt that it would ALWAYS lead to me wanting sex, and then if we didn't, it was "HER fault". This, in turn, led to years, nay, DECADES of frustration and unhappiness. What has me feeling as optimistic right now as I do, is that we finally can talk about this issue, and begin to fully understand each other. For now, she is willing to "let me drive", and I, for my part, am willing to not "press the point" when I know she's not up to it - in short, we are both willing to be respectful of each other. BINGO!!! This, I think, will lead to HUGE advances in our R. I'm really excited about it. It seems like such a small thing, and so basic it's hard to believe it has eluded us (ME) for so long, but it's so fundamental, I'm sure it's right and real. Yes, I fully expect we will uncover other issues, but I think we are now laying a groundwork of mutual love and respect that will allow us to continue making progress.

Last edited by Tim2point0; 03/07/06 04:50 PM.

TimV2.0

Me: 53
Her: 56
D26 (at home)
S23 (at home)
S18 (at home)

Formerly Tim47...
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 338
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 338
So what's a good term for a 4 thing that doesn't have connotations we don't want. As "foursome" would not work in this situation.

Scott


"Satisfaction is not guaranteed." Rule #19 Ferengi "Rules of Acquistition"
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 652
B
Member
Offline
Member
B
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 652
How about a quad-killing?


Gone the carvings and those who left their mark.
Gone the kings and queens, now only the rats hold sway.
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,390
Member
OP Offline
Member
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,390
Quartet? Quadrilateral? Four Play?


TimV2.0

Me: 53
Her: 56
D26 (at home)
S23 (at home)
S18 (at home)

Formerly Tim47...
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,012
G
Member
Offline
Member
G
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,012
I vote for Four Play!

GEL


Well behaved women rarely ever make history!
Page 4 of 5 1 2 3 4 5

Moderated by  Michele Weiner-Davis 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Michele Weiner-Davis Training Corp. 1996-2025. All rights reserved.
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5